Sample report · drawn from a real anonymised audit

The full audit report, in ten modules. Three unlocked, seven locked.

The layout of the full audit report. Numbers are anonymised from a Dutch SME audit in June 2026. Each locked module card below spells out what it covers. Pick a plan to see them populated for your brand.

Overview · What to fix first

Recommended where the brand lands. Reach is the problem, not reputation.

Where this brand appears, it appears first (position #1 across all engines). But uneven presence (0–71%) plus zero third-party corroboration means most customers asking AI for this category never see it at all.

Mentioned (best engine)
71%
ChatGPT app
Mentioned (worst engine)
0%
ChatGPT API only
Independent sources
0
L6 fail
MODULE 01·Overview · Three findings that explain the rest

What's actually happening.

  • 01
    L2 Mentioned in answers

    Where this brand appears, it appears first, but only 30% of the time on Claude.

    Average position #1 across every engine where mentioned. The job to be done is volume of presence, not quality of presence. Recent locale improvements lifted Gemini from 34% to 67%; everything else still sits in the 20–40% band.

  • 02
    L6 Independent sources

    Zero independent domains name this brand.

    Engines synthesise across multiple sources. With only the brand's own domain to draw on, they hedge or stay silent. This is the root cause behind the uneven presence AND the cluster of AI mistakes. Without independent sources to triangulate, the engine is improvising.

  • 03
    L5 Facts right

    36 claims marked 'needs client confirmation' before adjudication.

    Engines are repeating contradictory facts the brand publishes about itself: the supported-store count appears as 12 / 13 / 14 across different pages, and one competitor is in-or-out depending on the source. Locking one canonical fact source collapses 36 of 38 flagged claims at once.

MODULE 02·Visibility · L2 · per engine

How often each AI engine mentions the brand.

Counted only on questions that don't name any brand, so every mention here is earned.

Gemini
67%
mixed
Claude
30%
recommended
Perplexity
39%
positive
ChatGPT (app)
71%
recommended
ChatGPT (API)
0%
Google AI Overviews
22%
neutral

Average position when mentioned: #1 across all engines. When it lands, it lands first.

MODULE 03·Topic coverage · L2 · content gaps

Where the gaps are, by buyer-intent topic.

Each cell = how often that engine mentioned the brand on that topic. Deeper coral = mentioned more often. Red-outlined zeros = content gaps.

TopicGeminiClaudePerplexity
Price comparison846055
Supported supermarkets714450
App reliability382218
Privacy1285
Family / multi-user000

Read: Family / multi-user has zero coverage across every engine. That's a content gap.

7 more modules in the full report

Locked until your audit runs.

Each of these is populated from your data: your questions, your AI engines, the sites AI trusts about you, your fix plan. The preview titles below tell you exactly what they cover.

Unlock the full ten modules for your brand.

Same layout as the sample above. Populated with your questions, your AI engines, your fix plan. Each audit runs in about 90 minutes.

from €59/mo
monthly plans · cancel anytime
Get my free snapshot →
Free snapshot first, no card needed.